The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The given chart shows the comparision of the rate of international students graduate in Canadian universities between 2001 and 2006. What stands out from the given chart is that there was an upward trend in the percentage of graduated students in New Brunswick university in 2006 while Ontario suffered a downward trend in the percentage of graduated students in 2001.
Top of the list was New Brunswick university, with 5.5 percent in 2001 and around 12 percent in 2006. The second position belonged to Nova Scotia university, with 5.3 percent in 2001 and 11 percent in 2006. It is clearly seen that the rate of graduated students in Nova Scotia university was not quite as high as it was in New Brunswick university.
In the opposite, bottom of the position was Ontario university and The second lowest place was Newfoundland and Labrador university. The percentage of graduated students in Newfoundland and Labrador university was 5.5 percent in 2006 , as opposed to the lowest place, which was 5.3 percent in 2006.
Looking at the given chart, in 2001 saw an equality percentage between Alberta and British Columbia university, at 4.8 percent respectively. That happened the same with Nova Scotia and British Columbia university in 2006, at 11 percent correspondingly. Especially, the percentage of graduated students in Manitoba university in 2001 was nowhere near as high as it was in 2006, at 4.6 percent and 5.3 percent in turn.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-25 | Vuthungan | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | dangchan21 | 78 | view |
| 2021-04-19 | tranuyen | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | Mohamad Alen Aliansyah | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | fachryadul92 | 11 | view |
- When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The pie chart below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in 2 years. 73
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 56
- The pie chart below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in 2 years 69
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the table below. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nged to Nova Scotia university, with 5.3 percent in 2001 and 11 percent in 2006. ...
^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rador university was 5.5 percent in 2006 , as opposed to the lowest place, which w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08016877637 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94904110573 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.396624472574 0.547539520022 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 359.1 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.192069047 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.4 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231379397451 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129522103586 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104661234599 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172616885 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101771402008 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.