The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008
The line chart indicates the data on the percentage of the difference about the money earned between man and woman over the 30 year period.
Overall, there was a general trend, it’s a decrease in the variance of the income between man and woman in all countries mentioned except for Australia. Besides that, the percentage in Japan always is the highest figure from 1978 to 2008.
In the United States and the United Kingdom, the difference of the earnings between both sexes is quite similar with a slow reduction from 30% in 1978 at approximately 27% in 2008 although the United States was stay at a little higher level when compared with the UK. France also witnessed a gradual decline between 1978 and 2008 with the number is around below 20%.
In comparing with France, the percentage of Australia is quite similar from 1978 to 1998. But by the year 2008, it had increased rapidly by 25%. Japanese is always the highest percentage in the injustice of income between man and woman, at closely 50% in 1978 then go down to about 40% in 2008.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: is always
.... Besides that, the percentage in Japan always is the highest figure from 1978 to 2008. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the highest figure from 1978 to 2008. In the United States and the United King...
^^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntage of Australia is quite similar from 1978 to 1998. But by the year 2008, it h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, then, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72972972973 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42939149256 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551351351351 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6085170654 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.375 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353586755565 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151920226853 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551157894041 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207864938577 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334354820645 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.