The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
The chart illustrates the trends in housing, including a more detailed look at the changes in the ratio of families staying in rented housing to owner-occupiers in England and Wales over the span of 83 years from 1918 to 2011.
It can be seen from the graph that the gap between rented and owned accommodation was considerable in 1918, which then narrowed to strike a balance in 1971. However, from that moment on, the gap had widened again as the number of households becoming owners had increased.
Regarding rentals, the percentage of families choosing such type of residence had more than halved from nearly 77 to 35 percent by the end of the given period, showing an early highest rate in 1918, a subsequent steady fall to its lowest in 2001 (holding above 30 percent), and a further leveling off.
By contrast, the rate of privately-owned housing went up during the same timescale. Starting from about 22 percent in 1918, it reached a peak of nearly 70 percent in 2001 to slightly decline (around 65%) in 2011.
The only exception, however, was 1971 when both rates leveled off, at 50 percent.
- Learning about the past has no value for those living in the present 76
- Living in large cities today poses many problems for people What are these problems Should governments encourage more people to live in smaller towns 56
- The internet means that people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The table shows how many employees were busy at one of four different spheres of economics in the UK in two observation years
- The Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools Do you agree or disagree with this prediction 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...useholds becoming owners had increased. Regarding rentals, the percentage of fam...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, regarding, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76963350785 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69062069202 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649214659686 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.6037149592 43.030603864 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.142857143 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232979995377 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877691837116 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071773030604 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103188039912 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070014335944 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.