The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart provides information on the proportion of households owning and renting accommodation in two different region from 1918 to 2011.

It can be seen from the graph that the percentage of households in owned was around 22% in 1918, but there was a free fold growth in terms of rental accommodation during the same year. Between 1935 and 1953, the proportion of household in owned facility was 31%, as opposed to 68% by rented house. But in 1961, the figures showed approximately a twenty percent growth from 41% to 59% respectively. Interestingly, by 1971, the percentage of households in both owned and rented were noticed exactly similar at one half.

In contrast, the household rate had experienced some significant change. In 1981, the considerable number of people holds in their own house at exactly two third, while merely 40% of people had lived in rental house. At the same time, a 65% of people holds in owned accommodation, whereas a half of them chose rental house in 2011. But the year between 1991and 2001, exactly the similar proportion of English men and women had used both owned and rental house facilities.

Overall, it is clear that the percentage of own house usage experienced an increasing trend, whereas the figures for rental category showed some decline throughout the given period.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'region' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'regions'.
Suggestion: regions
... renting accommodation in two different region from 1918 to 2011. It can be seen ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wo different region from 1918 to 2011. It can be seen from the graph that the ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e noticed exactly similar at one half. In contrast, the household rate had exp...
^^^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the year between 1991and 2001, exactly the similar proportion of English men an...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, third, whereas, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00452488688 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80952846134 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556561085973 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0944104042 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.6 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21974769808 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940452166357 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726157855321 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15387567434 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874820688358 0.0819641961636 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.