The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011
The given graph illustrates the proportion of the rented household and owned household accommodation in Wales and England between 1918 and 2011.
In general, it can be seen that, the per cent of the households in owned accommodation increased to reach a peak in 1918. While the lowest rate of the households in rented accommodation was in the same year.
To begin with, it can be observed that, the households in owned accommodation was about 23% in 1918. Moreover, grew up gradually to 50% in 1971. In 2001, the proportion reached to a peak ( about 69%). However, the rate decreased slightly to approximately 64% in 2011.
Turning to households in rented accommodation, it can be witnessed that, the percentage stood on around 77% in 1918. Then dropped markedly to 50% in 1971, which is the same rate for households in owned accommodation for same year. Furthermore, the per cent went down sharply to around 32%. Then grew up slightly to about 35% in 2011, which is less than the percentage for households in owned accommodation .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 122, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tion increased to reach a peak in 1918. While the lowest rate of the households in re...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n 2001, the proportion reached to a peak about 69%. However, the rate decreased s...
^^
Line 4, column 405, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ge for households in owned accommodation .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, moreover, then, while, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90285714286 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03472924848 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468571428571 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6982153994 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9090909091 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389641412806 0.215688989381 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148639539573 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148456710881 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290728960135 0.15604864568 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152596676468 0.0819641961636 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.