The chart below shows the proportion of businesses making e-commerce purchases by industry in Great Britain between 2008 and 2012.
The chart illustrates the proportion of company's purchasing in the internet by diverse industries in Great britain. It compares changes in the period from year 2008 to year 2012.
Overall, all businesses purchases outnumbered each other in different years by a significant margin. While two of them consistently increase, other three have more difficult trajectory, seeing both rises and falls.
Until 2012 e-commerce purchases in construction and wholesale increased gradually, almost threefold and at 40%, from 22 to 55% and approximately 41 to 60% respectively. Consequently, the most significant rise in company buying in the internet in britain has seen in construction.
There was no other significant consistent increases. In contrast, both e-commerce purchases by retail, info and comms have almost no changes, only slightly growths the and then decreases; meanwhile business buying by manufacturing fluctuated over the period, from about 32 to 58% and, as a result, increasing almost twofold. Whilst retail started to make more their internet buying in 2009, rising from 32 in the year 2008 to 50%, continuing slightly grow in future years. In general, most of e-commerce purchases made info and comms business in 2011, that is about 74%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rajectory, seeing both rises and falls. Until 2012 e-commerce purchases in const...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...et in britain has seen in construction. There was no other significant consisten...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...here was no other significant consistent increases. In contrast, both e-commerce ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, then, while, in contrast, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52577319588 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06558920555 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634020618557 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.8730838329 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.2 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245403734362 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952840815117 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928850039654 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153072581055 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0995533424173 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.