The bar graph features data on the percentage of coffee and tea consumption habits in last 4 weeks in five Australian cities. It is clear from data that greater amounts of Australian people was less likely to buy fresh coffee and instant coffee in Sydney and Melbourne, while Australia people was less frequent to buy fresh coffee in Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart.
There was a clear pattern of greater amounts of people who have coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in Sydney, Melbourne and Hobart. With respect to Sydney and Melbourne, significantly more people who went to cafe for coffee and tea than people who bought only fresh coffee, with number registering 60% and 43%; respectively. The pattern begin to continued with Hobart, in which total numbered 54% of people who bought instant coffee and 38% of people who bought only fresh coffee.
Figures for Brisbane and Adelaide exhibited a different pattern in which there were less people than other 3 cities The data on Brisbane show noticeably more people who bought instant coffee than people who bought fresh coffee, as a figures reached 53% and 34%, in that order. Turning to Adelaide, there was a varying pattern in which percentage of people who went to cafe fo coffee and tea equaled people who bought only instant coffee, totaling 50%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of people who bought only fresh coffee. Figures for Brisbane and Adelaide exhibi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...a different pattern in which there were less people than other 3 cities The data on ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a figure' or simply 'figures'?
Suggestion: a figure; figures
...than people who bought fresh coffee, as a figures reached 53% and 34%, in that order. Tu...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 3.15609756098 444% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9592760181 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40569133335 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447963800905 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.6637575248 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.571428571 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5714285714 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188210791942 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119131633568 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485292906894 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150090446199 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444635572768 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.