The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

The bar chart demonstrates the outcomes of research on the number of people buying coffee and tea and their drinking habits in 5 Australian areas. Overall, people who went to a café last month seem to have the highest percentage among 4 cities except for Adelaide, whilst the citizens who bought fresh coffee at the same time made up the lowest proportion of the chart.

Regarding the first three cities, it is cleared that residents who went to a coffee shop in the last 4 weeks remained higher than other figures, reached approximately 62% in Sydney, followed by 64% and around 55% in Melbourne and Brisbane, respectively. The figure for who bought instant coffee appeared to have an upward trend in the order from Sydney to Brisbane, from about 45% to around 53%. The percentage of people buying fresh coffee was relatively low, at just 43% in Sydney then decreased slightly to 42% in Melbourne. However, there was a sharp deceleration to under 35% in Brisbane. Those results show that people were more likely to go out for a drink rather than buying commodities such as instant or fresh coffee in the previous month.

Talking about the other 2 areas which are Adelaide and Hobart, the number of residents who purchased fresh coffee continued to be the lowest figure, just under 40% in both 2 cities. In Adelaide, residents getting instant coffee rose to the first ranked figure at exactly a half and then increased to about 55% in Hobart in the last 4 weeks. The figure for those who went to a café was relatively high, at nearly a half in Adelaide and reached about 63% in Hobart.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, regarding, then, except for, such as, talking about

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 279.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71326164875 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50465067611 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537634408602 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.822083457 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24575692117 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101970255599 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103470810071 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17313115572 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0840195730519 0.0819641961636 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.