The bar chart illustrates the percentage of the drinking habits and consuming-coffee and tea flour in the 5 different cities in Australia.
Overall, Melbourne use the most coffee and tea involving buying flour and having a cup of tea and coffee at a cafes. In 4 cities excepting Adelaide, going to cafes for coffee or tea in last 4 weeks account for higher rates than making own coffee at home or office.
At the first glance at fresh coffee, the percentage of Sydney and Melbourne residents using is around 45%, the highest proportion, while this figures for Brisbane and Adelaide was significantly lower, around 35%. People living in Hobart consumed the same kind of coffee drinking approximately 40% at home or offices.
Secondly, Around 55% Brisbane and Hobart communities chose instants coffee and made it by themselves in last 4 weeks, whereas this figures was just 45%. Such coffee was consumed by approximately 50% residents from Melbourne and Adelaide.
Finally, Numberous Human living in Melbourne and Hobart sitting in a store and enjoyed a cup of coffee took up the highest proportion, at round 63%. Adelaide was the cites where using the least coffee and tea outside.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 109, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a cafe' or simply 'cafes'?
Suggestion: a cafe; cafes
...r and having a cup of tea and coffee at a cafes. In 4 cities excepting Adelaide, going ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ound 45%, the highest proportion, while this figures for Brisbane and Adelaide was s...
^^^^
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Hobart communities chose instants coffee and made it by themselves in last 4 week...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, secondly, whereas, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0152284264 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7876386824 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548223350254 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5721427267 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.777777778 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161694891818 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825051586143 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631559116405 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105932229976 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656498433949 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.