The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of residents who had buying and drinking habits in different Australian cities 4 weeks ago. General, there was the same rank of three strategies in four cities, apart from Adelaide. Also, people buying fresh coffee always were consistently the lowest in the five cities.
It is noticeable that the most common habit was going to a café for coffee or tea, which stood at just under 64% of people in Melbourne. Next came city residents in Hobart, at about 63%, followed by people in Sydney doing this habit, over 60% of people. That figure was around 10% higher than that in Adelaide, the lowest one.
Regarding people buying instant coffee, the majority of them, at roughly 53%, belonged to Hobart. While that figure in Adelaide was the third out of the five cities, at approximately 50%, it was the highest in this city. Also, nearly 53%, 47%, and 46% of people having this habit in Brisbane, Melbourne, and Sydney respectively.
In addition, the difference between the figures for residents buying fresh coffee in Sydney, 43%, and Melbourne, 42%, was marginal. There was the same figure for people in Brisbane and Adelaide, which were about 5% of people lower than that in Sydney.
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Wild animals have no use in the 21st century and trying to preserve animals now is just wastage of resources 84
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, third, while, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90865384615 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45683425945 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581730769231 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.1404161734 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.8181818182 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182092990602 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075250766649 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551025859286 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120358445606 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434790659307 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.