The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie chart depicts information on the four types of tourist destinations in Britain as chosen by the public. The study covers the year of 1999.

Generally, most of the people preferred going to theme parks, museums and galleries as opposed to wildlife parks and zoos. It is also clear that out of all theme parks, most tourists went to Blackpool Pleasure Beach more than the others.

In detail, a survey in 1999 revealed that 38 % of the totality of all tourist chose theme parks while less than a percent was noted for museums and galleries. This was followed by the historical houses and monuments, and the wildlife parks and zoos with 16 % and 9 %, respectively. By comparison, the figure seen for wildlife parks and zoos was four times less than that of the percentage for museums and galleries.

Concurrently, different theme parks were identified as the most popular for visitors wherein, 47 % was posted for Blackpool Pleasure Beach which is less than three folds that of the figure for Albon Towers at 17 %. Pleasureland in Southport had 16 % while the least ranked theme parks involved in the survey were Chessington World of Adventures and the Legoland in Windsor, with 10 % each.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ol Pleasure Beach more than the others. In detail, a survey in 1999 revealed tha...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96534653465 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64304591703 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559405940594 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8211727984 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.444444444 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107490273848 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061006883073 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688492825668 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940037405125 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100498965366 0.0819641961636 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.