The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999.

These graphs illustrate about the percentage of people who visited different types of tourist spots of Britain
including Wildlife Parks and zoos, HistoricHouses and Monuments, Meuseums and Galleries and Theme Parks in 1999.
It is cogent that highest percentage of people were attracted to Theme Parks in 1999.

Overall, the lowest attracted tourist spot was Wildlife and Zoos. Moreover, almost same percentage of people prefered
Theme Parks and Museum and Galleries in 1999.

On one hand 38% people visited Theme Parks, which was the highest percentage in 1999. On the other hand, only 9% people
prefered to visit Wildlife and Zoos in that year, which was the lowest percentage among these 4 catagories. However, this number
increased slightly for Historic Houses and Monuments and reached to 16%. In addition, the percentage for Museums and Galleries
went down slightly from the highest percentage catagory and reached to 37%.

Furthermore, among the theme parks most number of people were interested to visit Blackpool Pleasure beach , whereas, Legoland, Windsor and
Chessington World of Adventures was attracted by the lowest percentage of Theme Parks lover (47% and 10% respectively). In addition,
the second and third most visited Theme parks were Alton Towers and Pleasurelans, Southport with 17% and 16% respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lmost same percentage of people prefered Theme Parks and Museum and Galleries in ...
^^^
Line 8, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 1999. On the other hand, only 9% people prefered to visit Wildlife and Zoos in t...
^^^
Line 9, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...these 4 catagories. However, this number increased slightly for Historic Houses a...
^^^
Line 10, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the percentage for Museums and Galleries went down slightly from the highest perc...
^^^
Line 13, column 107, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rested to visit Blackpool Pleasure beach , whereas, Legoland, Windsor and Chessi...
^^
Line 13, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e beach , whereas, Legoland, Windsor and Chessington World of Adventures was attr...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, whereas, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53883495146 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74751419987 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514563106796 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.079613847 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.1 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 12.0 3.83414634146 313% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18994716865 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901023976436 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648284921711 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0825395389623 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745454552969 0.0819641961636 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.