the chart below shows three main causes of land damaged in four different areas. summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The graph illustrates the information about the crucial reason damaged land in four continents. It is clear that the harm of Africa and Asia is much more higher than Australia and Europe. The element causes the centrals disadvantaged is breeding.
Africa lost 500 million hectares by breeding followed by free cutting affected 380 million hectares and then farming 300 million hectares.
Different from other 3 three regions, free-cutting is the main reason lead Asia lose their land and farming harmed Asia area just less than free-cutting 10 million hectares . Australia and Europe both lose their land because of breeding,free-cutting and farming respectively. Breeding take 210 million hectares of land from Australia and 110 million hectares from Europe. Free-cutting take about 100 million hectares of both two continents. Europe is damaged 80 million hectares due to farming. The less affected by farming is Australia lose only about three a fifth million hectares
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...hat the harm of Africa and Asia is much more higher than Australia and Europe. The element ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ss than free-cutting 10 million hectares . Australia and Europe both lose their la...
^^
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , free-cutting
...both lose their land because of breeding,free-cutting and farming respectively. Breeding take...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 553, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by farming is Australia lose only about three a fifth million hectares
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 33.7804878049 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45695364238 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96677702701 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53642384106 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6654006179 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.2 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0891578307766 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441677404838 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476233287039 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0641409797749 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486262379571 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.