The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph and the table illustrate the quantity of export earnings in five different categories from 2015 to 2016 in a particular nation.
In general. It is clear that the value of exports in most categories saw an ascending trend while the opposite case for the gems and jewellery industry. In addition, the earnings gained from the exports of petroleum and engineered goods were highest amongst other products.
In the year 2015, the export value of petroleum products was the first rank at over 60 billion dollars, followed by that of engineered goods at approximately 56 billion. The money gained from exported gems and jewellery, agricultural products was about 42, 31 billion dollars, respectively. The figure for exported textiles was lowest at 25 billion.
After one year, the value of exports in petroleum products increased minimally to 63 billion a 3% increase. Similarly, there was a sharp growth in engineered goods and textiles industry, an 8,5% increase case for engineered goods and the textiles increased 15.24% from 25 billion to over 30 billion dollars. In contrast, the amount of exports in gemes and jewellery dropped modest from 42 to just over 40 billion dollars. Regarding to agricultural product, the export value almost was not change, fluctuated roughly 31 billion.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, similarly, well, while, in addition, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79327017609 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528571428571 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1725548557 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.2 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15935203947 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744831203728 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624559753228 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129125580481 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635251877596 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.