The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
While the bar chart illustrates export earnings in a specific nation based on five various items between 2015 and 2016, the table indicates how these items changed in proportion in 2016, starting from 2015.
Overall, Petroleum and Engineered products were the two dominant exported goods. Interestingly, only Gems and Jewlery products experienced a downward trend among five given categories throughout the time.
In detail, having the highest figure (around 60 billion USD), Petroleum products witnessed a small increase of 3% in 2016. Meanwhile, the second largest export - Engineered goods with about 58 billion USD, rose significantly to approximately 63 billion in 2016. In parallel, the country recorded a 0.81% growth in Agricultural products export in 2016 compared with roughly 31 billion USD in 2015. On top of that, Textiles had a tremendous change (15.24%) in values from only 27 billion USD in 2015 although it was the least exporting goods. Over the period, the last remaining category decreased slightly from over 40 billion with a 5.18% difference in its percentage change.
To sum up, Gems and Jewlery was still three main product items out of five exporting categories playing important roles in the country despite its plunge in 2016.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, still, while, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3216080402 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75313911744 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638190954774 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8890824617 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338434383347 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131163279679 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794561190782 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187969487005 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788873558651 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.