The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in
each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the provided bar chart and table reveals information about the exchanged money in various sectors in the field of exports from 2015 to 2016. Information in bar chat shows the money for each sector while the rates of changes are equipped in the table.
Overall, almost the money for each field rose during the period shown except that for gems and jewelry. Nevertheless, the increased percentage of textile value is highest.
At the beginning of period, with 60 billion dollars, earned money from petroleum products ranked first and was as high as over twice that from textiles, which held the last rank with nearly 25 billion dollars. In 2016, the figure for textiles was seen as the most significant increase with over 15 percent and shared the comparable with that for products from agriculture.
Furthermore, the data about goods in engineered fields and jewelry lie roughly on two extremes over the period. However, in 2016, the value of engineer products increased by 8.5 percent to reach a closer gap with the first rank; conversely, that of gems and jewelry was the only decreased one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and jewelry was the only decreased one.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98930481283 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48832671756 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598930481283 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9964487203 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.625 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18369811366 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812800585773 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695233160982 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10657619983 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717379588055 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.