The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015
The given bar chart details the statistical information on the earnings made by a particular country from the export of five different freights, while the table reveals the proportional change in the value of the same from 2015 to 2016.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that despite a significant change in the export trend of all the commodities, the petroleum products continued to lead the entire chart. Also, the export value in all but one of the five product categories increased.
According to the given illustration, more than $60 billion was earned from petroleum and the engineered goods in 2016, an increment of nearly $2 and $3 billion respectively from each. Also, whilst the textile sales rose up to $30 billion from $25 billion(the largest turnover during the given period), the agricultural products witnessed a slight uptick to $32 billion, up by a billion only. However, in contrast, the gem and jewelry section plunged close to $40 billion, a decline of nearly $2 billion.
Turning to the table, although the textile export went up by a maximum of $15.24% as against 3% in the petroleum products, 8.5% in the engineered goods, and .81% in the agricultural goods, it remained at the lowest rank in the chart throughout the period. Furthermore, followed by a reverse trend, gem, and jewelry plummeted down by a decline of 5.18%.
- 82
- Some people believe that it is essential to include physical education classes in the curriculum for all school aged children Others think that children s time is better spent on more academic subjects 78
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 78
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters traveling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed goods in 2016, an increment of nearly and billion respectively from each. Als...
^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ods in 2016, an increment of nearly and billion respectively from each. Also, wh...
^^
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...s in 2016, an increment of nearly and billion respectively from each. Also, whilst th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'billionthe the largest'.
Suggestion: billionthe the largest
...xtile sales rose up to 0 billion from 5 billionthe largest turnover during the given period, the a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... close to 0 billion, a decline of nearly billion. Turning to the table, althou...
^^
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...lose to 0 billion, a decline of nearly billion. Turning to the table, although the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02212389381 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87865441913 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561946902655 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.8041260759 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.875 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188532072243 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833459380116 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867883721733 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123759134829 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849638791041 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.