The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
The given pie chart and table compares the percentage of Anthropology graduates, who finished from one university and the aim and salaries after five years.
Overall, in pie chart shown that graduates were more interested in full-time work them others sector, while salaries gradually increased as freelance consultants after five yearers work.
First of all, in pie chart, Anthropology graduates had a destination with full-time work by 52%. Besides, a tiny portion of graduates worked for part-time, while no more than 5% pupil interested in part-time work along with postgrad study and 8% were studying in postgrad degree with full-time work. Moreover, 12% students were job less, when 8%. did not know the aim.
According to the table, 10% of graduates working in private companies but only 5% of them who are working in government sectors or as freelance consultants earn between $25,000 and $49,999. Although the income of over one-third of graduates in private companies is between $25000-$74999 and 40% of freelance consultants earn from $75000 to $99999, half of the graduates in government sectors earn the highest salary among them ($100000 and above).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 329, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'jobbed'.
Suggestion: jobbed
...-time work. Moreover, 12% students were job less, when 8%. did not know the aim. ...
^^^
Line 6, column 348, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Did
...r, 12% students were job less, when 8%. did not know the aim. According to the t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, moreover, third, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27567567568 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73750564939 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.2991209571 43.030603864 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253079974181 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115325572093 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947837809632 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179353266932 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0935479467727 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.