the chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years

Essay topics:

the chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years

The pie chart and the table illustrate the destination of Anthropology students graduating from one university provided by six aspects and the incomes of Anthropology graduates after 5 years’ work in three types of employment. Overall, what stands out from the graph is that full-time work ranks the top, while part-time career and postgrad study account for the lowest percentages. Besides, the proportion of 25,000-49,000 group constitutes the smallest numbers in employment.
In particular, when it comes to Anthropology graduates’ destinations, the percentage of full-time jobs is at 52%, which is the highest score, followed by part-time work and unemployed at approximately 15%. Full-time postgrad study and not known elements share the equal proportion of 8%, which occupies the fourth and fifth largest. It is accompanied by part-time work and postgrad study at 5%, which are the smallest.
Meanwhile, regarding salaries of Freelance consultants and Government sector, 75,000 - over 100,000 group accounts for the highest percentages of 40% for the former and 30%,50% for the latter respectively. The third largest proportion is 15%, which is represented by 50,000-74,999 group that is three-fold higher than that in 25,000-49,999 sector. Concerning private companies, the top two positions are 50,000-74,999 and over 100,000 elements at 35% and 30% accordingly. Afterwards, following this was 75,000-99,999 and 25,000-49,999 aspects with 25% and 10% correspondingly.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, if, regarding, third, while, in particular

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1262.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76255707763 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37000625352 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602739726027 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1077956261 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.2 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109671362747 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496137152463 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944946222519 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094712179507 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985210928572 0.0819641961636 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.4140731707 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.