The chart gives information about Southland's main export's in 2000, 2021 and future projections for 2025.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the number of major exports between three items namely, international tourism, dairy products, meat products, from 2000 to 2025. Units are measured in billion dollar.
Overall, it is clear that, the figures for international tourism anfd dairy products have accounted the highest profit in 2021 and forthcoming attention for 2025. The weakest item can observe in the meat products in all of the years.
At the beginning of the 2000, the greatest revenue revealed in international tourism (just over 8 billion dollar) compared to the other items. The meat products have experienced the lowest earning about 1 billion dollar smaller rather than dairy products.
Turning to 2021, both of the types such as international tourism and dairy products have been a considerable rocket to 10 billion dollar respectively when meat products have been a gradual plummet to 5.5 billion dollar nearly.
According to the information given, the Southland's main export's future protection to 2025 which experience a significant income in both of the items namely, international tourism and dairy products. Moreover, they hold the first position as it will be expected the greatest level off 10 and 9.5 billion dollar respectively. However, the meat products will conjecture to reach the slowest degree almost 5 billion dollar in the forthcoming ambition for 2025.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...rom 2000 to 2025. Units are measured in billion dollar. Overall, it is clear that, t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...tem can observe in the meat products in all of the years. At the beginning of the 2000,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37962962963 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81516506106 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564814814815 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6759907358 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.2 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123421412137 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522798932907 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635053924831 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729229531287 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473751937066 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.