The chart show the different how three countries learn English in 2010 and 2015

Essay topics:

The chart show the different how three countries learn English in 2010 and 2015.

The pie charts compare the information about the way people from three different nations learn English between 2010 and 2015.
Overall, the percentage for people choosing evening class takes account of the biggest portion among three countries. But the number of students for this option together with studying English abroad decline over 5 years while there is an increase in the proportion for online class.
In 2010, country C had the largest percentage for students choosing evening class, followed by 72 percent for country A and 72 percent for country B. In terms of learning English abroad, there was no place for that kind in country C, meanwhile 20 percent of English learners in nation B chose to learn aboard, compared to 25 percent of country A. In contrast, the proportion for online class registers were very humble in all three countries from 5 to 8 percent.
By 2015, the figures for online class in country B had experienced a significantly increase of 24 percent but the figure for aboard had remained while country A and C went through a minimal increase. And although there had been some decreases, people in general preferred evening English courses.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-12-10 Trần Ánh Vy 67 view
2024-11-19 hahoaan 78 view
2024-11-12 Huyenlbg87 84 view
2024-11-10 Giang Tran 84 view
2024-11-10 Giang Tran 84 view
Essays by user bake.sg :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 45, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to even'.
Suggestion: to even
...all, the percentage for people choosing evening class takes account of the biggest port...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to even'.
Suggestion: to even
...argest percentage for students choosing evening class, followed by 72 percent for count...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 68, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('significantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...line class in country B had experienced a significantly increase of 24 percent but the figure for aboard...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in contrast, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00510204082 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5860201082 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576530612245 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0188752601 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.625 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267416249291 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130116984455 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111468415962 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189849983071 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12923744803 0.0819641961636 158% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.