The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The given diagram illustrates the number of times US residents frequented to fast food establishments in the period of 10 years from 2003 to 2013.
It is evident that Americans tended to show up at these eateries one to four times a month and this eating trend has been losing its popularity years after years.
As can be seen from the chart, in 2003, the figure for US people consuming fast food weekly was over 30% before rising about 3% in the middle of the period and then dropped to nearly 25% at the end. Meanwhile, the proportion of patrons visiting fast food franchises around once or twice a month was only 25% in 2006, less than 5% and about 7% compared to 2003 and 2013 respectively. The frequency for those eating convenience food daily was under 5% throughout the given time, while that for several times a week and a few times a years were 3 to 4 times higher.
Looking at the graph in more detail, in the second half of the period, the percentage of individuals eating fast food from one to six times a week decreased about 5% both, whereas about 8% of the surveyed people altered their routine of eating fast food to once or twice a month and this habit became the most prevalent among Americans.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 530, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a year' or simply 'years'?
Suggestion: a year; years
...or several times a week and a few times a years were 3 to 4 times higher. Looking a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, second, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52252252252 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42449489023 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576576576577 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.699459505 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.333333333 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.0 22.9334400587 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203689490405 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110259842887 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649677313355 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126141270348 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640640773234 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.53 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.