The chart below depict the frequency of USA people who ate in fast food restaurants during 2003 to 2013. Overall, it is readily apparent that in 2003 and 2006, Americans mainly ate at fast food restaurants once a week, while in 2013 they mostly ate once or twice a month. Furthermore, during 2003 to 2013, Americans rarely ate at fast food restaurants every day.
Looking at the charts at more detail, it can be seen that in 2003 and 2006, Americans mostly ate at fast food restaurants once a week, at approximately 31% and 33%, respectively. After once a week, once or twice a month became the second most frequent time for Americans to eat at fast food restaurants during 2003 and 2006, at 30% and 25%, consecutively. Next, Americans mainly ate at fast food restaurants several times a week during 2003 and 2006, at around 17% and 20%, respectively. And in both 2003 and 2006, Americans' least frequency in eating in fast food restaurants was every day, at below 5%.
Meanwhile, in 2013, Americans mainly ate at fast food restaurants once or twice a month, at about 33%. Next, Americans mostly ate at fast food restaurants once a week, at approximately 27%. Following once a week was several times a week and a few times a year, at about 16% and 15%, consecutively. The least frequency for Americans to eat in fast food restaurant in 2013 was every day, at about 3%.
any tips on solving this…
any tips on solving this question? I'm confused since there are so many categories on this question. Pls help. Thanks. God bless
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'Americans the least'.
Suggestion: Americans the least
...spectively. And in both 2003 and 2006, Americans least frequency in eating in fast food restau...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, look, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.670781893 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75559193844 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.378600823045 0.547539520022 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8296378897 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.181818182 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0909090909 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321501353419 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205709114033 0.103423049105 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117045118591 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290463058457 0.15604864568 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123477853213 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.22 8.06136585366 77% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.