This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010. The results come from a survey of 5,000 couples.
The bar chart shows information about the favorite honeymoon destinations which was surveyed 5,000 newlywed couples in Britain in 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the several Asian countries were the most popular places for honeymooners, such as Thailand and Bali. Another noticeable point is that most of the places chosen far less than were in Europe like Spain, Paris and the Lake district.
Looking at the details, Thailand was the number-one destination, with 1,410 couples choosing this for their honeymoon, making it slightly more popular than Bali, with 1,335 couples. Costa Rica was the third popular destination for honeymooners, at 750 couples spending their honeymoon there. Next, the Maldives was ranked fourth with 600 couples.
Regarding the other destinations, the Greek Islands came next, with 432 couples preferring to stay there. Just 209 and 140 newlywed couples who were asked said that they liked spending their honeymoon in Paris and Spain respectively. And the least popular honeymoon destination was the Lake district, with just only 124 couples choosing this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | maiphuonganh | view | |
| 2023-02-17 | Mikki14 | view | |
| 2023-09-09 | maiphuonganh | view | |
| 2023-09-09 | maiphuonganh | view | |
| 2023-09-09 | maiphuonganh | 89 | view |
- In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move to regional areas outside big cities.Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples 85
- The pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made. 73
- The chart below gives information about birth and death rates in Switzerland from 1970 to 2020 42
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, regarding, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45294117647 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62527639013 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.534813214 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254652409656 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109543434911 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102987065737 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173571738728 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123029735034 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.