The first bar chart shows changes in the number of marriages and divorces in the USA, and
the second chart shows figures for the marital status of American adults in 1970 and 2000.
It is clear that there was a fall in the number of marriages in the USA between 1970 and
2000. The majority of adult Americans were married in both years, but the proportion of
single adults was higher in 2000.
In 1970, there were 2.5 million marriages in the USA and 1 million divorces. The marriage
rate remained stable in 1980, but fell to 2 million by the year 2000. In contrast, the divorce
rate peaked in 1980, at nearly 1.5 million divorces, before falling back to 1 million at the end of the period.
Around 70% of American adults were married in 1970, but this figure dropped to just under
60% by 2000. At the same time, the proportion of unmarried people and divorcees rose by
about 10% in total. The proportion of widowed Americans was slightly lower in 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f marriages and divorces in the USA, and the second chart shows figures for the m...
^^^
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of marriages in the USA between 1970 and 2000. The majority of adult Americans we...
^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ied in both years, but the proportion of single adults was higher in 2000. In ...
^^^
Line 8, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...USA and 1 million divorces. The marriage rate remained stable in 1980, but fell t...
^^^
Line 9, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the year 2000. In contrast, the divorce rate peaked in 1980, at nearly 1.5 milli...
^^^
Line 12, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0, but this figure dropped to just under 60% by 2000. At the same time, the propo...
^^^
Line 13, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f unmarried people and divorcees rose by about 10% in total. The proportion of wi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62643678161 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2581819351 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9240255007 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4444444444 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 3.83414634146 287% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273883213642 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118912125203 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069127962681 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113357267682 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593737394707 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.