The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050

The information about the populations of different age groups in Yemen and Italy in 2010 and prediction for 2050 is depicted by the rendered pie charts. The data has been calibrated in percentage.

To begin with, the population of above 60 years old people in Yemen in 2000 was only 3.6%. However, 46.3% and 50.1% of the population of 15-59 and 0-14 age groups people in Yemen in the same year. Moreover, there will be a slight increase noticed in the projection for 2050 of 15-59 and 60+ age group people, which will be accounted for 57.3% and 5.7%. Furthermore, the population of 0-14 age group people will be decreased by 13.1% in 2050.

Moving towards, in Italy, the most number of people in 2000 and prediction for 2050 of 15 to 59 years old people, which is accounted for 61.6% and 46.2% respectively. Although the population of 60+ age group people was 24.1% in 2000, it will be increased dramatically, which will be comprised to 42.3%. In addition, there were fewer people who were 0-14 years old, it was only 14.3%. A drastic decrease will be seen in the percentage of the population of this age group, which will be 11.5%.

To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that half of the population in Yemen in 2000 was 0-14 years people. However, in the same year, the percentage of the population for this age group in Italy was the highest.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iced in the projection for 2050 of 15-59 and 60+ age group people, which will be ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, in addition, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1114.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60330578512 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56953034016 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446280991736 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1307738298 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8333333333 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 5.23603664747 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293841208402 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132698229998 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865391578553 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228216107762 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578053078124 0.0819641961636 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.