The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients,all of whicj may be unhealthy if eaten too much
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature,and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts illustrate the average proportions of three types of nutrients that may be unhealthy if overused in daily meals, including breakfast, lunch, dinner and snacks in the USA. Overall, the sodium and saturated fat consumption can mostly be seen in dinner, except for added sugar which is the major nutrient in snacks.
Turning first into the types of nutrients used in snacks and dinner. sodium and saturated fat consumptions in dinner are relatively higher than any other meals, at 43% and 37% accordingly. On contrary, dinner contains just nearly one-fourth of added sugar. Turning to snacks, this type of meal has the lowest percentage of sodium consumption, at 14%. Similarly, the saturated fat consumed in snacks is just about one-fifth. However, a high amount of added sugar can be witnessed in snacks, at 42%.
The other two meals do not register significant percentages in all three types of nutrients. The proportion of sodium used in breakfast is the same as snacks, at 14%, followed by 29% in lunch. Saturated fat has quite similar percentages of consumption to sodium for breakfast and lunch, at 16% and 26% in turn. By contrast, added sugar used in breakfast and lunch is relatively low, at 16% and 19% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Sodium
...of nutrients used in snacks and dinner. sodium and saturated fat consumptions in dinne...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, however, if, may, similarly, so, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02884615385 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81131220809 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4802681093 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1666666667 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124541306631 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536617601056 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665942605922 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100470169606 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473921187987 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.