The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two line graphs illustrate the proportion of electric appliances (washing machine, refrigerator and vacuum cleaner) in each household and the hours spent doing the housework every week for a decade from 1920 to 2019 in a nation.
Overall, it has been observed that all three equipment were owned over the time with refrigerator and vacuum cleaner being in the lead. On the contrary, the time spent on housework was seen to decline during this period.
According to the first chart, in 1920 both washing machine and vacuum cleaner was owned by 40% and 30% of the families respectively whereas the number of refrigerator was slightly above 0%. In the first 4 decades, there was a rise in number of refrigerator by 50% in 1940 and by 40% in 1960, while the amount of vacuum cleaner rose steadily by 20% in 1940 and 1960. The percentage increase in laundry machine was 20% in 1940 and was halved by 1960. 1n 1980, there was a dip in the number of washing machine and the count of refrigerators had reached 100% whereas the percentage for vacuum cleaners continued to rise until 2000. Both the refrigerator and vacuum cleaner reached a plateau after 2000 and the amount of washing machine rose gradually.
However, with the ownership of the appliances the time required for housework reduced significantly from 50% in 1920 to 20% in 1960 after which the decline was steady. A slight dip was observed after 2000 where the number of hours was just above 10.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 748, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ount of washing machine rose gradually. However, with the ownership of the appli...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7628458498 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59348783129 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458498023715 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1792639229 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110059615372 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531460888211 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598532870811 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945056571653 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560619153144 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.