The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia’s share of the Japanese tourist market.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The bar chart gives an information on amount of tourists from Japan visited foreign countries in 1985-1995, as showed on the x-axis. Conversely, the line graph indicates the percentage of Japan tourists in Australia’s market of tourism in the same ten-year period as the bar chart.
According to the bar graph, there was a clear growth of travelling tourists from Japan every year over the period (except 1991). At the beginning of the considered period there were nearly 5 millions traveling Japanese. The figure was slightly increasing throughout the period and reached about 15 millions Japanese tourists by 1995.
Turning to the line graph, Australia’s tourism market experienced nearly threefold increase of Japanese visitors by the end of the period (from 2% to 6%, respectively). However, in 1988 there was a decrease of tourists’ from Japan share by around half a percent. This drop was followed by continious growth up to 1993. Next, the share slightly reduced in 1994 compared to 1993.
All in all, both graphs depict positive tendency in the number of travelling Japanese in 1985-1995. It is clearly seen that the amount of tourists from Japan became greater from year to year. Particularly, the percentage of visitors from Japan in Australia dramatically rose over the period.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1100.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26315789474 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96240648818 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55023923445 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0314454556 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6666666667 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4166666667 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.58333333333 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23716543668 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091887585007 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605273582161 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158194444777 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374853221161 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.