The pie charts give information about the number of food budget for family meals stay in restaurant and self-cooking at home, whereas the line graph illustrates the figure of meals eaten in two different places are fast food and sitdown restaurant from 1970 to 2000.
Overall, the number of family meals stay in restaurant was increased in every ten years given. At the same time, fast food restaurant was significantly rose compared to sit-down restaurant.
Looking more closely at the pie charts, we can see that in 1970 with one in ten in restaurant meals which were the lowest percentage and nine-tenths self-cooking at home. To 1980 and 1990, the percentage of family preferred eaten in restaurant continued to increase steadily reach 15% and 35% respectively, mean self-cooking at home was decreased but it still accounted for the higher percentage than restaurant. Noticeable, in 2000, there was equal to half in both places.
According to the line graph, in the 1970s both restaurants with the same started point about 20% and same increased trend, but fast food restaurant rose sharply through the period, exceeded the sit-down restaurant in 1980s and reached almost 90% in 2000s. In comparison, the sitdown restaurant significantly less interested, approximately 50%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 215, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
...eriod, exceeded the sit-down restaurant in 1980s and reached almost 90% in 2000s. In com...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2000s'.
Suggestion: in the 2000s
...taurant in 1980s and reached almost 90% in 2000s. In comparison, the sitdown restaurant ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, still, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28780487805 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93101326958 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556097560976 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.7980850334 43.030603864 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.5 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353117106732 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152801227588 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101286795746 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238682062027 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814846889763 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.