The charts below show the percentage of time working adults spent on different
activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008. Summarise the information by
selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts compare the daily schedule of adults in one state between 1958 and 2008. It can be seen that adults were doing different activities during whole day.
Overall, people spent their maximum time in working. Sleeping time was the second highest. Very less citizens were interested in sports as well as in travelling for work.
In 1958, almost one third of the day was spent on working (33%), and marginally less time on sleeping with 32%. Travel to work is one of the rare activity. People spent only 2% time for it from their routine. Going out with family and friends was less popular compare to working with 19%. Relaxation and playing sport had covered 8% and 6% respectively.
In 2008, the time spent on working increased by 9%, whereas the time for sleeping decreased by 7%. The time spent on travelling to work increased four fold from 2% to 8%. There was a significant decline on the time spending on going out with family and friends. It was dropped from 19% to 6%. In contrast, the time for relaxation and sports was inclined by 5% and 2% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 96, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun citizens is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...eping time was the second highest. Very less citizens were interested in sports as w...
^^^^
Line 4, column 224, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...ignificant decline on the time spending on going out with family and friends. It was dro...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was inclined by 5% and 2% respectively.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, third, well, whereas, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.640625 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4304061214 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.828831673 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 59.4 112.824112599 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.8 22.9334400587 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179569002685 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679402743243 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532799601079 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118115989977 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171810759913 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.8 13.2329268293 51% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.68 61.2550243902 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.74 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.