The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014.
The pie charts illustrate proportions of those volunteering in different organizations in the years 2008 and 2014.
The most noticeable trend is for increasingly higher percentages of volunteers to be represented by people working in education, health care and unspecified fields, while the opposite is true for the other 3 categories.
In 2008, nearly one quarter of the total volunteers were from environmental organizations, followed by the figure for those in education and art (21% and 18%, respectively). Sport and unspecified areas attracted the same proportion of volunteers , at 15% each, which was more than double the percentage of health care.
6 years later, noticeable increases were recorded for the figures of education (by 8% to nearly 30%) and the ‘others’ category (by 10% to exactly a fourth). Growing by a humble 1% to 8%, health care volunteers still constituted the smallest percentage across the board. By contrast, the figure for environmental organizations dropped by 7% whereas a decline of 6% was seen in those volunteering in both sport and health care.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and art 21% and 18%, respectively. Sport and unspecified areas attracted the same...
^^
Line 9, column 245, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...racted the same proportion of volunteers , at 15% each, which was more than double...
^^
Line 13, column 433, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nteering in both sport and health care.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41860465116 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38286124587 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598837209302 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8568414694 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.142857143 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234117973257 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121257562144 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106896792108 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17162883387 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115255632957 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.