The charts below show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources
in a country between 1985 and 2003. Summarize the information by selecting and
reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts compare the energy generated from different means in a country over a period of 18 years between 1985 and 2003.
Overall, it is clear from graphs that most energy is produced by oil in given period of time.
Additionally, the energy drawn from coal and other renewable increased over period 18 years. On contrast, the hydrogen produced lowest energy.
In 1985, oil were used mostly to generate energy than any other source, which accounted for 52 % total energy produced,but in 2003 it reduced to 39%. Similary,the energy produced from nuclear source were the second highest by 22% of total production of energy.But in 2003, it became third highest producer ,at 17%.
On other hand,the energy drawn from natural gas increase by 10% from 13% to 23% over period of 18 years. While, the hydrogen accounted for same percentage of energy generated in 1985 and 2003. Meanwhile, the energy produced from coal and other renewable sources increased in 2003,from 1% to 4% and 8% to 13% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...most energy is produced by oil in given period of time. Additionally, the energy drawn from c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 119, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'produced the lowest'.
Suggestion: produced the lowest
...iod 18 years. On contrast, the hydrogen produced lowest energy. In 1985, oil were used mostl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 119, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , but
...accounted for 52 % total energy produced,but in 2003 it reduced to 39%. Similary,the...
^^^^
Line 8, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...,but in 2003 it reduced to 39%. Similary,the energy produced from nuclear source wer...
^^^^
Line 8, column 261, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...st by 22% of total production of energy.But in 2003, it became third highest produc...
^^^
Line 8, column 306, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n 2003, it became third highest producer ,at 17%. On other hand,the energy d...
^^
Line 11, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...st producer ,at 17%. On other hand,the energy drawn from natural gas increase ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27607361963 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07827199531 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576687116564 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5062183283 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5555555556 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257039014503 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1257706429 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687976115253 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1633108405 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692266780279 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.