The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010

The given two circular graph illustrations the information regarding the percentages of the British students who were prefer to speak other languages rather than English at one university in England in two different years 2000 and 2010.
Overview, it can be seen that in 2000-2010, the percentage of British students were highest who were able to speak Spanish only. Whereas, the proportion of students was least who prefer to talk in two other languages in 2000.But, in 2010, the proportion was same those who speak French,German and Spanish language.
It is crystal clear that in 2000, 10% of British students were able to speak in two other languages and German only than English respectively. The proportion of British students was similar who prefer to speak in another language and French only. Less than half quarter of British students able to talk no other language while 30% of British students prefer to speak in Spanish only.
Moving Further, in 2010, the percentage of British students increased by 5% and reached to 35% who were able to speak Spanish only rather than English. The proportion of British students was same which was 10% who able to speak no other language,French and German only respectively.However, the proportion of British students also upsurged by 5% and reached to 20% and 15%, who prefer to speak another language and two other languages respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (32 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'graph' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The given two circular graph illustrations the information regarding...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'preferred'.
Suggestion: preferred
...ntages of the British students who were prefer to speak other languages rather than En...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...st who were able to speak Spanish only. Whereas, the proportion of students was least w...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
... to talk in two other languages in 2000.But, in 2010, the proportion was same those...
^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , German
...oportion was same those who speak French,German and Spanish language. It is crystal ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 211, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a able'.
Suggestion: who is a able
...British students was same which was 10% who able to speak no other language,French and G...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , French
... 10% who able to speak no other language,French and German only respectively.However, t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 283, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...age,French and German only respectively.However, the proportion of British students als...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 411, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...5%, who prefer to speak another language and two other languages respectively. ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13157894737 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91613568574 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.385964912281 0.547539520022 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.5153647845 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.25 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.515820278312 0.215688989381 239% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.294786727777 0.103423049105 285% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517101499131 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.385574547617 0.15604864568 247% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134538825897 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.