The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar charts reveal the data about the occupation type of graduated students and postgraduated students excluding full-time work type in the UK in 2008.

It is clear that the number of undergraduated students higher rather than postgraduated students. Most of students in both categories decided to continue their further study.

Bachelor students took their master degree was the highest with 29,665 students. This trend was followed by master college students in same categories with 2,725 students. In contrast, the number of students employed as voluntary workers accounted as the lowest in undergraduated and postgraduated students for 3,500 students and 34 students respectively.

The number of unemployment after finishing their bachelor degree accounted for 16,235 students that ten-times higher than unemployment who finished their postgraduate study. Part-time work attracted 17,235 graduated students. Interestingly, the number of part-time worker was the second highest in postgraduated students with 2,535 students that slightly different about 200 students compared with further study in same category.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...number of undergraduated students higher rather than postgraduated students. Most...
^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the students') or simply say ''Most students''.
Suggestion: Most of the students; Most students
...er rather than postgraduated students. Most of students in both categories decided to continue ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01863354037 4.92477711251 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05462529567 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527950310559 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.0863480609 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188852359086 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895492794023 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600875332298 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136398320016 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666410731504 0.0819641961636 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.34 11.4140731707 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.