The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given column graph illustrates the one nation's export earnings in five categories between 2015 and 2016 as well as the table indicates the change in proportion of product category of exports in 2016 compared with 2915.
Overall it is clear from the graph and table that, in the year 2016, four of five one's nation export earnings hike then 2015.
According to the graph that, petroleum products and engineered goods in 2016 were the highest export earnings in one's nation around approximately $63 billions compared to other given categories. While, in 2015, both petroleum products and engineered goods were slightly down just about $60 billions and $58 billions export earnings respectively. Agricultural products and textiles earnings were the least export earnings in both the years. Following this, gems and jewellery earned equal money round about $42 billions in these two years.
The table beholds changed occurred in 2016. The largest change took in textiles that it was boost up 15.24% in 2016 compared to the 2015,
But, gems and jewellery plunged down to 5.18%. All other products change in 2016 like agriculture products,petroleum products, and engineered goods escalated by 0.81%,3%, and 8.5% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...le that, in the year 2016, four of five ones nation export earnings hike then 2015. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...016 were the highest export earnings in ones nation around approximately 3 billions ...
^^^^
Line 8, column 107, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , petroleum
...change in 2016 like agriculture products,petroleum products, and engineered goods escalate...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, then, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31958762887 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7751880324 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541237113402 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4772287005 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.666666667 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279331873576 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134477001501 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107253505457 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191943018584 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115928633564 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.