The three given charts present what secondary school students in Australia do after they graduate over a twenty-year period starting in 1980.
Overall, there are three options for Australian graduates which consist of unemployment, employment and further education. Additionally, graduates gradually tended to choose to become employees rather than go to further education.
At the first glance at the charts, in 1980, it is obvious that haft of the total number of Australian students took further education after graduating from secondary school. In 1990, the figure decreased to 38% and in 2000, it was 37%. In other words, further education in Australia seemed to be less necessary to a part of secondary graduates.
By contrast, in 1980, 40 per cent of the total graduates engaged in employment. In 1990, the rate rose to 50% and continued increasing to 55% in 2000. Accordingly, Australian graduates were prone to working and earning money rather than getting a higher qualification. Besides, the unemployed proportion in 1980 was 10%, this rate slightly increased to 12% in 1990 and declined to 8% in 2000. These statistics somewhat reflect that unemployment is not a warning problem for Australian graduates for the past 20 years
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901 69
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 92
- The charts below show the number of girls per 100 boys in all levels of education 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, first, if, second, so, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11616161616 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90059523355 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 198.0 22.4926829268 880% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1013.0 112.824112599 898% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 198.0 22.9334400587 863% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 59.0 5.23603664747 1127% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103470714241 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103470714241 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769506638896 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055620402281 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 101.7 13.2329268293 769% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -121.03 61.2550243902 -198% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 79.3 10.3012195122 770% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.6 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.05 8.06136585366 212% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 11.4329268293 516% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 81.2 10.9970731707 738% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 59.0 11.0658536585 533% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.