The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years, 1960 and 2010.
The manifested pie chart, consisting of 4 plots, so that two plots per each town, evinces the fraction of people getting down to miscellaneous parts for two different years in the span of the half-century from 1960.
As can be seen from the upper row of plots, belonging to town A, the percentage of people taken up in the sections of sales and services approximately halved during 50 years, and their fraction became 20% and 16%, respectively. Moreover, the number of people who worked in the part of manufacturing more than doubled and their fraction changed from 29% in 1960 to 64% in 2010.
It can be found that the figure for workers in the service section marginally improved. Furthermore, While the workforce in manufacturing more than doubled from 10% in 1960 to 25% in 2010, the percentage of people hired in the section of sales considerably declined from 70% in 1960 to 53%.
Overall, it can be concluded that notwithstanding the tendency of people towards the section of sales dwindled, the predilection for joining the manufacture improved. On top of those, it is worth mentioning that the people of the two towns indicated different behavior towards the service section.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-22 | phanhhh | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | TRAN NGOC LINH | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-18 | Taran gill | 61 | view |
| 2021-06-10 | dnnghha | 42 | view |
| 2021-03-25 | hp_writing | 71 | view |
- The bar chart shows the expectation to change of European young people in the next 20 years in 5 di erent areas 57
- The chart below shows the number of passengers arriving at a train station per hour across a day and also the average price in US Dollars of their tickets 89
- Some people say there is no need for print newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 100
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94141122593 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.6826017497 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.571428571 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301179768176 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132885194045 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894222247663 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182015107459 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594238204495 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.