The diagram below shows the changes of a village in 1995 and now.
The maps illustrate the transformation of a village from 1995 to the present.
There is a number of significant shifts taking place. It is clear that the farmland and forest park have now been replaced with a golf course and tennis facilities. Apartments along the coast have been built right on the site where a fish market used to be.
There is more housing now in the North with the additional opening of a new road branching off to the West of the village. The shop and the fish market have been torn down to make way for a restaurant and apartments on the seafront. Moreover, the area has witnessed the disappearance of the fishing port.
In the Eastern area, the hotel and cafe still exist while the farmland and adjacent forest park have been turned into a golf course and tennis facilities. In addition, there is a car park constructed near the hotel since 1995.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
- The best way to resolve international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The chart below shows the waste disposal in 1 European country in four years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008. 61
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 73
- The best way to resolve international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups inone town who rode bicycles in 2011 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 718.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60256410256 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56749775218 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570512820513 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5864500184 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.7777777778 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0866696433199 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392313143833 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538029624548 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0681012390464 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579115203047 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.1 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.