The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production
The process diagram illustrates gradually how future home energy is produced as an alternative to conventional means. With this innovation, people do not have to purchase electricity; in contrast, they can electrify their houses with self-production energy.
Overall, six main stages are designated as the basis for generating energy from this new process, commencing on composting treatment and culminating at electricity production, involving six primary equipment: a composting tank, methane gas storage, compressor, combustor, generator, and battery as final energy storage.
In a more detailed process, leaves, food, scraps, and water are collected to fill in a composting tank; However, those components are only allowed to load up ¾ of the tank, thus enabling the fermentation process to result in methane gas. The methane gas is then channelled through a pipe to be stored in a large containment, called the methane gas storage container. Next, the methane gas goes to the compressor.
For the rest process, the compressed gas moves to the combustion engine to produce energy through a mechanical process; Nevertheless, this energy is not ready yet to be used as an energy source. Furthermore, prior to stepping to the last part of the energy production process, the mechanical energy is applied in a generator to turn the energy into electrical energy, which then can be stored in a battery. In the end, the stored electricity can then be funnelled to houses for home uses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r, and battery as final energy storage. In a more detailed process, leaves, food...
^^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the methane gas goes to the compressor. For the rest process, the compressed gas...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, thus, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3093220339 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08158655045 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580508474576 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 283.868780488 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.130603269 43.030603864 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.222222222 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15342595952 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692648449169 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734276181802 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966475566949 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729493623641 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 61.2550243902 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.