The diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drinks cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The graph illustrates the process in which, aluminium cans are recycled. Overall, there are 7 steps in the process beginning with the sorting of used aluminim cans and culminating in the reusing of recycled cans.
To begin with, the used aluminium cans are sorted into specific trash bin by the user. After that, these cans are collected and loaded into trucks so that they could be moved to the recycle station. In the next step, the used aluminium cans are transferred to the preparation phase where they are cleaned, sorted, shredded and compressed.
Afterward, the prepared material are heated with extremely high temperate so that they could be melted into hot liquid stage. As soon as the liquid aluminium are formed into 2.5mm to 6mm thick slide, they are rolled into many large rolls then they are recycled to become new aluminium cans. The last step is that these recycled cans are filled with coke and they are ready to be resued.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (8 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 783.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32309629719 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561728395062 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0341932039 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.875 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142759268625 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742036387822 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0216347648081 0.0843802449381 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108438224999 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017426665688 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.