The diagrams below guve information on transport and car use in edmonton.
The circular chart and the table illustrates the information about the types if transport and the people reason for using the car in Edmonton. The data is calibrated in percentage.
From the pie chart, it is lucid that 45 percent people use car as a means of transport for go to work, shopping etcetera. However, light rail transit is approximately used by 35 percent of people. Moreover, the use of bus and taxi is 10 percent approximately.
As is seen in the table, majority of people that is 55 percent use car for going to work. In addition, 45 percent business man travel by the car for meetings. Moreover, 40 percent people prefer travel by car for taking children to school that is 5 percent less than for business purposes. Interestingly, for shopping and leisure activities the percentage remained same that is 15 percent.
Overall, the maximum people prefer to travel by car for work and minimum use bus and taxi for leisure activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
- With the fast pace of modern life more and more people are turning towards fast food for their meals. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods in britian 67
- International tourism has enormous benefits at the same time it has some concerns for local inhabitants and the environment. Do the advantages of international tourism outweigh disadvantages. 78
- The line graph below shows the consumption of 4 kinds of meat in a european country from 1979 to 2004 67
- The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods in britian. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 792.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82926829268 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79834870999 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530487804878 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6455368101 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.2 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19420840267 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929390607797 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878166191223 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154091821076 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799484362688 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.