The diagrams below show stages in the development of simple cooking equipment. Write a report for a university lecture describing the information shown.

The diagrams are various steps of the stage in the development of simple cooking equipment. It is three types of cooking.

Having a quick glance on the illustration, we used the long pot with narrow neck and use wood for fire along with stone. The second little bit changed by first of stage.Hence, the same equipment was improved by building a shield made of clay around the fire.

As it is last stage, show in the diagram uses metal as the foundation stone including ash and air as the equipment essay to use. There are several categories of items such as handle,grate for charcoal and clay lining which are arranged into one to support for pot. As in all,the development of cooking tools using a different stages show in diagram has steadily increased day by day.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...d for fire along with stone. The second little bit changed by first of stage.Hence, the sa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
...nd little bit changed by first of stage.Hence, the same equipment was improved by bui...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , grate
...veral categories of items such as handle,grate for charcoal and clay lining which are ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...d into one to support for pot. As in all,the development of cooking tools using a di...
^^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'stage'?
Suggestion: stage
...ment of cooking tools using a different stages show in diagram has steadily increased ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, second, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 637.0 965.302439024 66% => OK
No of words: 136.0 196.424390244 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68382352941 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.41495297035 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58370885949 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.683823529412 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 198.9 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3420602751 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229090895524 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112594051527 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121495140203 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17741870228 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104947148113 0.0819641961636 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.