The given document depicts how prehistoric horses made external changes especially their foot throughout the 40-million-year-period.
Overall, the evolutionary process started 40 million years ago with a kind of animal called Eohippus and finish when it came to the contemporary horses. The most dramatic feature described is foot development
From the original phase, the Eophippus species had a structure of four-toed feet which were comparatively small then. Moreover, there was no fur on the back of Eophippus and they had short tails as well. In the following 10 million years, this animal type evolved into Mesohippus. Especially, they appeared with an inappreciable quantity of fur on their backs and longer tails. In comparison to Eophippus, this new evolution step shows three-toed feet structure with an apparent middle toe.
To become Merychippus, it took 15 million years. There was not much distinct from the previous one except for thicker fur and a prominently bigger and longer shape on the middle toe. For the eventual evolutional period, they are finally called horses as the lasted development. Horses show remarkably transformation on feet when all toes already merged into a hoof. Meanwhile, both fur and tails are observed to be more and longer in size and quantity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...feet which were comparatively small then Moreover there was no fur on the back of...
^^
Line 7, column 418, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: longer
...r and tails are observed to be more and longer in size and quantity
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be more and longer in size and quantity
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, moreover, so, then, well, while, except for, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24509803922 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92189759959 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622549019608 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 204.0 22.4926829268 907% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1070.0 112.824112599 948% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 204.0 22.9334400587 890% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 61.0 5.23603664747 1165% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257048942738 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.257048942738 0.103423049105 249% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151974856073 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0907295588693 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 105.3 13.2329268293 796% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -135.58 61.2550243902 -221% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 82.8 10.3012195122 804% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.65 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.86 8.06136585366 222% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 62.0 11.4329268293 542% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 83.6 10.9970731707 760% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 62.0 11.0658536585 560% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.