The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation.
Given are the two maps depicting the transitions of a students’ shelter over a course of time, since 2010.
Perceptibly, the area has been upgraded vaguely to become a more convenient living place with more features.
Before experiencing modifications, in the year 2010, access to the building from the Main Entrance, there was a student-bedroom and a bathroom on the left-hand side. The area at the end of the hallway was devoted for another student-bedroom, with a kitchen on the left. In the north of the accommodation, a living room was constructed, in the interim, a student-bedroom was set up in the right corner. Overall, the living place was surrounded by large planting places.
It is noticeable from the enhanced area that the area for the garden previously in the north side has been reconstructed to make way for student’s room; likewise, the old living room has been redesigned for the same purpose. On the opposite side of the building, an en-suite room has been added, which is connected with a bedroom in the corner. Moreover, the kitchen now is suitable for social activities. To take advantage of the southern garden effectively, the garden has been eliminated for a car-park area.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two maps depicting the transitions ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00497512438 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15035781107 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55223880597 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4894493262 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0569473725198 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0246290696204 0.103423049105 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0254637679327 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0356316257502 0.15604864568 23% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271302150579 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.