The diagrams show changes in a student common room.
Given is the lay-out of a student shared room depicting the changes in facility arrangement 5 years ago to present.
It is conspicuous that there are several adjustments eventuated with more room equipment in the common room throughout the years shown. Furthermore, space is made use of to create convenience for students.
Further north of the room, distinct kitchen appliances were put to serve for cooking purpose with a sink, a cupboard, two benches, a microwave and a refrigerator, which were all arranged next to altogether. However, 5 years later sees a difference in the number of items put in this area with a new added microwave replacing the room of the old bench. Moreover, a new drinks machine is now facilitated next to the refrigerator along with the appearance of television and some armchairs on the bottom right corner.
In terms of shared space for students, the room was full with four round tables with the company of every six chairs for each. In opposition, at present, one large rectangular table for 8 people replaces the position of the one adjacent to the main door. Another difference is the appearance of a long bench for laptop users which is located between a round table and the area for watching Television.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89573459716 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83535930185 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601895734597 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6381649216 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.777777778 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136762829726 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601199072742 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781652039031 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108363796757 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754467733623 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.