The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Both pie charts in combination depict the proportion of energy used in households in Australia and the release of greenhouse gas from the use of different gas in the household.
Overall, as shown in the first pie chart, heating was the major consumption of energy in Australia, whereas, cooling was the lowest. Similarly, water heating was the major responsibility for greenhouse gas, and cooling release the lowest portion of greenhouse.
To begin with, the maximum percentage of gas used in Australia was for heating purposes, which is accounted for 42%, however, it was followed by water heating with 30%. In the third position, the consumption of energy was other appliances with 15%, hence, refrigeration was in almost less by 50%. Furthermore, lighting and cooling were calculated as the lowest source to consume energy with 4% and 25% respectively.
Secondly, as per the second chart, water heating releases the highest portion of greenhouse gas from used energy, which is 30%, and 28% of other appliances were in the second position. However, heating emissions 15% of greenhouse gas, hence, refrigeration was just 1% lower. Whereas, the lowest slice in the pie chart was cooling, which is just 3% and lighting was accounted for 8% of greenhouse gas emission.
- Some people believe that unpaid community service be a compulsory part of high school programs for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Fossil fuel such as coal oil and natural gas is extensively used in many countries which cause harms to the environment The use of alternative sources of energy including wind and solar power however is being encouraged in many countries Is this a positiv 73
- the two map below show an island before and after the construction of tourist facilities summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 89
- The graphs below show how people in a European city reached their office and got back home in 1959 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 50, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'release the highest'.
Suggestion: release the highest
... as per the second chart, water heating release highest portion of greenhouse gas from used ene...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, third, whereas, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23618090452 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86096956288 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482412060302 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5604834303 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.777777778 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 5.23603664747 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206458268159 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111695357287 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835277761546 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169485922361 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922479913545 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.