The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use
The supplied pie charts compare changes the shares of six major items namely, heating, water heating, cooling, lighting, refigeration and other appliances reveals how the amount of energy and greenhouse gas emissions consumed in Australia.
Overall, the share of three items such as heating, water heating and other appliances remaining two. Moreover, water heating share contributed the largest portion whereas, cooling had the smallest share.
It is noticeable that, heating accounted for the most striking portion compared to other share ( just over 42%). By contrast, the share of refigeration has been a slight reached at 7% in an average Australian household energy and soaring 7% in the Australian greenhouse gas emissions. According to the given information, the portion of cooling depended considerably for just well under 2% and 3% respectively in both energy and greenhouse gas emissions. The share of lighting had replaced the weakest share (4%) but, it has been a gradual rocket to 4% in greenhouse gas emissions. Lastly, contribution of other appliances item followed by a sufficient surge to 15% in consumption of the energy and the percentage of 28% in the greenhouse gas emissions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...verall, the share of three items such as heating, water heating and other applian...
^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...striking portion compared to other share just over 42%. By contrast, the share of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, lastly, moreover, so, well, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3829787234 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97705120236 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547872340426 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8379024933 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171037354704 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804137479652 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805972349883 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110333124447 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782263264493 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.