The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. the second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
The given two pie charts illustrate the types of energy use and amount of emissions relative to them in an Australian house.
According to the first chart, dominant portions of energy, respectively 42% and 30%, are being consumed for heating and water heating. The rest is divided between refrigeration, lighting, cooling and other appliances which all together account for less than 30% of total energy use. The least share belongs to cooling and is about 2%.
On the other hand, second chart presents that the relative contribution of heating to the GHG emissions is only about 15% and it is the water heating that emits the largest amount of pollution, approximately 32%. “Other appliances” with overall share of 28% stands in the second place on the list of polluting activities. Cooling is responsible for the 3% of exhausts. Refrigeration gives out greenhouse gases twice as much its energy use share which is about 14%. Lighting and cooling cumulatively emit 11%.
Overall, there is no clear and distinct correlation between energy use and emissions. However, it can be concluded that heating considering its high energy consumption has low emissions. Though water heating has the highest contribution to the GHG emissions in an Australian domicile.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, while, in contrast, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99407563179 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626666666667 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4574588632 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.428571429 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229326597426 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102848959281 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636943037617 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146265152293 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509596212622 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.