The flow chart illustrates the consequences of deforestation.Summerise information by selecting and reporting the main feature.
Consequences due to deforestation is explained by the flow chart with a detailed logical explanation. It is observed that clear curring of the forest is divided into four categories by each leads to critical issues such as flooding and decreased biodiversity. However, only one category leads to flooding is heavy logging equipment that compresses the soil, and because hardened solid rainwater is not able to absorbed by the soil and it runs off.
Another three categories arrowed into pioneer species migration and vegetation degradation with led to danger in biodiversity. Furthermore, all three categories headed to pioneer species migration and vegetation degradation following danger in biodiversity.
Firstly, It is true that a decreased amount of root (role of hold surface soil in place) is observed. Due to the action of deforestation, this action issue led to topsoil corrosion. Then higher chances of forest fires made both from an accident or deliberate action. This process brings forest destroyed waste wood from logging. Micro-organisms, unfortunately, lost supply of feeding organism because of the former process. Also, decreased moisture in air upset plants moisture returning process, and then moisture changes precipitation amount by the negative way which contributes land to be extremely dry and directed to drought.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, lastly, may, second, so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1239.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55605381166 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9870789599 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 106.607317073 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659192825112 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.3773048558 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5833333333 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0413271658844 0.215688989381 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0198286759677 0.103423049105 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657642782745 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0475888223226 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951776446452 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.